✦ FREE TO LEARN · NO SIGN-UP · YOUR OWN PACE ✦
0 XP ✧
FREE B2 READING · TEXTS & ANSWERS

The community garden decision

Read a text, answer ten questions and learn how the evidence supports each answer.

Read the story ↓ Go to questions ↓
5reading tests
50scored questions
10–15min per text
Read this text See your reading path
How this practice helps you
  • Connect your answers to evidence in the passage.
  • Keep going with another text at the same level.
  • Review explained answers and save your quiz scores.
B2 reading adventure
Challenge 5 of 5 · 50 questions to explore
See the path →

Start here or choose any challenge. Your quiz scores stay on this device.

Choose another test when you are ready. Your completed scores remain saved on this device. Allow around an hour for reading, answers and review across the collection.

Read at your own pace

01An unused plot beside a community centre became the subject of a lively debate. One group of residents proposed a garden where people could grow vegetables together. They imagined practical learning, fresh food and stronger connections between neighbours. Another group preferred a simple open space with benches, arguing that not everyone had the time or physical ability to maintain a garden.

02At the first discussion, supporters of each proposal described their own version as the obvious choice. The centre’s coordinator asked them to list the activities they hoped the space would support rather than defend a finished design. The lists overlapped more than expected: both groups wanted somewhere welcoming, affordable and useful across different age groups.

03The coordinator then asked about responsibilities. A garden would require watering during holidays, storage for tools and an agreement about distributing produce. An open space would also need cleaning, repairs and decisions about opening hours. Making these tasks visible changed the discussion. The alternatives were no longer a demanding garden and a completely effortless park.

04Residents eventually proposed a small trial with raised planting beds, a clear path and several benches. Volunteers would maintain the beds for one season, while the centre recorded how the whole area was used. The trial included a review date and an agreement that the beds could be removed if they attracted too little support. This made the decision easier to reverse, though it did not remove the need for commitment during the season.

05The final plan was less ambitious than the garden supporters had first imagined and less open than some other residents wanted. Its value lay in creating a way to learn from use before committing the entire plot. A trial cannot settle every disagreement, especially when people value different things. It can, however, turn some predictions into observations and reveal which practical problems need attention.

Skills to work on in this practice

Questions 1–5 build confidence; 6–10 check transfer and detail. Use Practice for feedback after each answer, or Test yourself to check at the end.

Practise, then understand your answers

10 questions · 10 XP per correct answer · explanations included

Answer every question to see your score.0 / 10 answered
Question 1

What benefit did garden supporters expect?

  1. Learning and stronger neighbourhood connections.
  2. No maintenance at all.
  3. Guaranteed free food for the whole town.
Answer & explanation

Learning and stronger neighbourhood connections.. Paragraph 1 lists practical learning, fresh food and connections without guarantees.

Question 2

Why did some people prefer benches and open space?

  1. Nobody liked vegetables.
  2. The centre banned all plants.
  3. Not everyone could commit to gardening.
Answer & explanation

Not everyone could commit to gardening.. Paragraph 1 mentions time and physical ability.

Question 3

What shifted the first discussion?

  1. Cancelling the project.
  2. Listing desired activities instead of defending designs.
  3. Voting without discussion.
Answer & explanation

Listing desired activities instead of defending designs.. Paragraph 2 describes the coordinator’s reframing.

Question 4

What did both groups want?

  1. A welcoming and affordable space for different ages.
  2. Only vegetable beds.
  3. An expensive private garden.
Answer & explanation

A welcoming and affordable space for different ages.. Paragraph 2 identifies shared aims.

Question 5

Why discuss cleaning and repairs?

  1. To prove gardens need no water.
  2. To rule out all benches.
  3. To show the open-space option also required work.
Answer & explanation

To show the open-space option also required work.. Paragraph 3 challenges the idea of an effortless alternative.

Question 6

What was included in the trial?

  1. Only a locked storage building.
  2. Raised beds, a path and benches.
  3. A full commercial farm.
Answer & explanation

Raised beds, a path and benches.. Paragraph 4 lists the design elements.

Question 7

How long would volunteers initially maintain the beds?

  1. One season.
  2. One afternoon.
  3. Forever without review.
Answer & explanation

One season.. Paragraph 4 specifies one season.

Question 8

What made the plan easier to reverse?

  1. A promise that everyone would agree.
  2. A permanent building on the plot.
  3. A review date and an agreement allowing removal of beds.
Answer & explanation

A review date and an agreement allowing removal of beds.. Paragraph 4 links review and possible removal to reversibility.

Question 9

Did the final plan fully satisfy either original proposal?

  1. The text says every resident withdrew support.
  2. No, it involved compromises.
  3. Yes, it exactly matched both.
Answer & explanation

No, it involved compromises.. Paragraph 5 describes less garden and less open space than different groups wanted.

Question 10

What limit does the writer place on trials?

  1. They cannot settle every disagreement about values.
  2. They can never supply useful observations.
  3. They eliminate the need for commitment.
Answer & explanation

They cannot settle every disagreement about values.. The final paragraph distinguishes evidence about use from disagreements over values.

Make the reading stick

Summarise the passage in two sentences. Include the main change or argument, then explain one detail that supports it. Revisit the numbered paragraphs if an answer surprised you.

Try a guided writing task →
KEEP YOUR PRACTICE GOING

You reached the end of this path

Review any unfinished challenges, revisit mistakes or choose another path. There is no need to repeat a perfect score.

Choose your next practice path →

Go deeper: five reading challenges · 15–20 minutes

Use these after the quiz to practise explaining, not just choosing an answer. Write in your own notes; these tasks are self-reviewed.

  1. Summarise the main change or argument in three sentences. Compare your summary with the opening and ending.
  2. Choose two details that support the main idea. Note the paragraph for each and explain the connection.
  3. Choose an unfamiliar word. Infer its meaning from context, then use it in a new sentence.
  4. Revisit one wrong option from the quiz. Explain why the passage does not support it, using a specific detail.
  5. Write 60–80 words applying or responding to one idea from the passage. Separate what the text says from your own opinion.

Self-check: Is each claim supported by the passage? Have you explained the connection rather than copied a sentence? Have you kept your own view separate from the writer’s?

A CLEAR WAY FORWARD

Make this your practice session

Choose the time you have. These are suggested study plans, not timers.

10–15 MIN

One text, properly understood

Read this passage, answer ten questions and check the evidence behind every answer.

Read this passage →30 MIN

Compare two reading challenges

Review this test, then try another text at the same level. Notice which questions need a second look.

Open another B2 text →60 MIN

Build a reading routine

Choose four texts. After each test, explain why the other options are wrong before continuing.

Choose your reading tests →

Find your next lesson.